Quiz: What’s Your Position on Israel and Palestine?

I’ve created this to explain my own position and help others understand theirs. Many people don’t realise what their views actually imply, especially when it comes to supporting specific governments, movements, or national causes. Below are a range of possible positions. Choose the one that matches your view most closely. Then scroll down to see what that position might really mean in terms of ethics, consistency, or contradiction.


Each position answers four simple questions:


  1. Do you support Israel’s right to exist?
  2. Do you support the current Israeli government (Netanyahu/Likud)?
  3. Do you support Palestinian people and their rights?
  4. Do you support Hamas as a legitimate political or resistance movement?


Position 1

✅ Support Israel

✅ Support Likud/Netanyahu

❌ Oppose Palestinians

❌ Oppose Hamas


Position 2

✅ Support Israel

❌ Oppose Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

❌ Oppose Hamas


Position 3

✅ Support Israel

❌ Oppose Likud/Netanyahu

❌ Oppose Palestinians

❌ Oppose Hamas


Position 4

✅ Support Israel

✅ Support Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

❌ Oppose Hamas


Position 5

❌ Oppose Israel

❌ Oppose Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

✅ Support Hamas


Position 6

❌ Oppose Israel

❌ Oppose Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

❌ Oppose Hamas


Position 7

❌ Oppose Israel

✅ Support Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

✅ Support Hamas


Position 8

✅ Support Israel

❌ Oppose Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

✅ Support Hamas


Position 9

❌ Oppose Israel

✅ Support Likud/Netanyahu

❌ Oppose Palestinians

✅ Support Hamas


Position 10

✅ Support Israel

✅ Support Likud/Netanyahu

✅ Support Palestinians

✅ Support Hamas


Now scroll down to see what your position says about your views.

Position Analysis


Position 1 – Hardline Nationalist

You support Israel and its government but deny Palestinians their rights. This is a one-sided, ethnonationalist position that supports domination, not coexistence. It is rooted in dehumanisation and easily tips into genocidal logic.


Position 2 – Pro-Peace and Balanced

You support Israel’s existence, oppose extremist governance, support Palestinians, and reject terrorism. This is a morally consistent and rational stance that recognises both peoples’ rights and the danger of violent actors on both sides. (This is my position).


Position 3 – Security-First Zionist

You support Israel but are skeptical or dismissive of Palestinians altogether. This is not genocidal, but it ignores Palestinian humanity and fails to offer any path to peace.


Position 4 – Contradictory

You support both Israel’s government and Palestinian rights, but oppose Hamas. This may be well-meaning but ultimately supports policies that harm the people you claim to care about.


Position 5 – Genocidal Anti-Zionist

You reject Israel’s existence, back Hamas, and frame terrorism as legitimate resistance. This position is openly genocidal and antisemitic. There is no support for peace or coexistence here.


Position 6 – Pro-Palestinian Leftist (with Risk)

You reject both Hamas and Israel, but back Palestinian rights. If this also includes denying Israel’s right to exist, then it still becomes a form of ideological genocide, even if framed in moral terms.


Position 7 – Irrational Extremism

You support both Hamas and Likud, two groups that want each other destroyed. This is illogical, incoherent, and likely driven by bias, not thought.


Position 8 – Incoherent Idealist

You support Israel, reject its government, support Palestinians, and support Hamas. This directly conflicts, since Hamas aims to destroy Israel. You cannot support both sides’ existence and one side’s destruction.


Position 9 – Violent Nihilist

You support an oppressive Israeli government and Hamas, while opposing both national groups. This is possibly trolling, or reflects a desire for endless war.


Position 10 – Supporter of All or Confused

You support everyone and everything, even opposing forces. This is either dangerously naive or utterly confused, and does not amount to a real solution.


Share your position in the comments section 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Rabbit Hole Goes Deeper: Following the Paper Trail That Funded Brexit

Image
Unanswered questions, dissolved companies, and £8 million in political donations that never fully appeared in any account. What began as a campaign promise ended in a financial mystery. By Sean Ash In June 2016, Britain voted to leave the European Union. The result was close. Just over 1.2 million votes separated Leave from Remain. In the years since, debate has focused on sovereignty, trade, and immigration. But beneath it all, there’s a deeper question. One that hasn’t been answered. Where did the money come from? And where did it go? Arron Banks, the businessman behind Leave.EU, declared that he gave a total of £8 million in support of the Leave campaign. That money, according to Electoral Commission records, included both loans and donations, some from him personally, others through companies he controlled. It was the largest declared donation of the entire referendum. But after months of personal investigation, digging through company filings, electoral data, and public records...
Read more

Asylum Seekers Come On Boats Because We Told Them To

Image
  The law requires them to reach our shores—so why are we punishing them for it? By Sean Ash Every day, headlines shout about the small boats arriving on British shores. Politicians speak of invasion, media outlets stir public outrage, and many citizens are left wondering why this is happening and who is to blame. But behind the noise and confusion lies a truth that very few are willing to confront. This is not a crisis imposed on Britain by the outside world. It is a situation created by Britain itself. The system that now brings desperate people across the Channel is not a foreign invention. It is a British design, rooted in our own laws, treaties, and political choices. In the aftermath of the Second World War, Britain played a central role in drafting the 1951 Refugee Convention. This legal document was created in response to the horrors of war and genocide, particularly the plight of Jewish refugees who had been turned away by countries that refused to offer them safe haven. T...
Read more

Reform Supporters Drop Race Card After Learning Attacker Was White

Image
A tragic attack, a flood of assumptions, and a silence that followed inconvenient truth By Sean Ash Today should have been a celebration in Liverpool. A Premier League title win, a victory parade, fans gathered in joy. But that celebration turned to horror when a car mowed down innocent civilians. Before the facts were clear, Reform UK supporters and others on the far right rushed to social media. Not with thoughts for the victims. Not with concern or prayers. But with insinuation. “Place your bets.” “Probably one of the usual suspects.” “Anyone got the ethnicity yet?” “Religion of peace again?” We have seen this script before. When tragedy strikes, the immediate instinct for some is to point fingers, always at minorities, always at outsiders. To them, every act of violence is another opportunity to reaffirm their biases. But then came the truth. A 53-year-old white British man. Suddenly, the narrative collapsed. The tone shifted fast. The same people who were fixated ...
Read more